Tools — Tracker
Work to Residence Tracker
Modest self-review across employer, tenure, pay, and registration dimensions—outputs are bands, not eligibility verdicts.
- Structured orientation before advice
- Clear boundaries with licensed filing
- Premium, calm presentation
A short self-review for employer-backed, tenure-heavy pathways often discussed alongside Green List work-to-residence framing. It does not count months of work or verify accreditation.
Advisory progress
0% self-assessed weighting- 1Employer / offer credibility
- 2Time in skilled role (self-assessed)
- 3Pay and employment evidence
- 4Registration / occupational gates
Employer / offer credibility
Accreditation, offer letter quality, and whether duties are documented—not just a title.
Time in skilled role (self-assessed)
Rough honesty only—official pathways depend on instruction definitions.
Pay and employment evidence
Registration / occupational gates
Your next step with RTNZ
FAQ
Work to Residence Tracker — questions
No. It is an advisory preparation tracker: it maps your self-reported answers to planning milestones and reading suggestions. Immigration New Zealand decides using law, instructions, and your evidence.
RTNZ keeps outputs modest so they stay honest. Milestones and bands are editorial planning support until a future instruction-backed snapshot can replace them.
No. It helps you see where your preparation is thin. Official definitions of skilled employment and tenure belong to instructions and case officers.
Advisory preparation, clear onward routes
Trackers link to Skilled Migration support pages and the two public CTAs. They describe how your preparation sounds to you—not an official “on track” judgment.
Premium brief
The 60/40 gated strategy
How we split your next quarter between orientation-grade signals and human review—available in full after eligibility review.
How we weight calculator output against advisory judgement
Tools fail when users treat scaffolding as filing authority. The 60/40 framework keeps pathway maps and points surfaces honest—structured inputs, explicit policy mode labels, and escalation to eligibility or a strategy session before irreversible decisions.
- When a tool narrows questions vs when it should stop
- Policy snapshot discipline vs live instruction changes
- Cross-linking to silo depth without duplicating licensed advice
Unlock the full 60/40 playbook—mapped to your role and timeline
Start with a structured eligibility view. We only open detailed strategy where there is a realistic path—no generic PDFs.
Check EligibilityPrefer to talk first? Book Strategy Session